V dannoy stat'e provoditsya analiz sistemnyh aspektov strukturnyh sdvigov v oboronno- promyshlennom komplekse Rossiyskoy Federacii. V mirovoy praktike osnovnymi teoriyami, ob'yasnyayuschimi strukturnye izmeneniya v promyshlennosti, yavlyayutsya bihevioristskaya i neoklassicheskaya teorii. Sledstviya dannyh teoriy, harakternye dlya samoreguliruemyh rynochnyh sistem, mogut byt' ispol'zovany dlya resheniya problem strukturnyh preobrazovaniy v OPK. Predstavlyaetsya, chto v tekuschuyu sistemu raspredeleniya prav sobstvennosti na aktivy OPK, osnovannuyu na centralizovannom upravlenii, dolzhny vklyuchat'sya mehanizmy, zamenyayuschie analogichnye rynochnye. Eto pozvolit povysit' obschuyu rezistentnost' sistemy hozyaystvovaniya OPK k vneshnim shokam i povysit' skorost' obmena informaciey mezhdu upravlyayuschimi organami i hozyaystvennymi strukturami.
structural shifts, neoclassics, behaviorism, defense industry complex
1. Jovanovic, Boyan, and Peter L. Rousseau. The Q-theory of mergers. No. w8740. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2002.
2. Golbe, D.L., White, L.J., 1988. A time series analysis of mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. economy. In: Auerbach, A. (Ed.), Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences. NBER: University of
3. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 2003. Stock market driven acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics 70, 295-311.
4. Rhodes-Kropf, M., Viswanathan, S., 2004. Market valuation and merger waves. Journal of Finance 59.
5. Rhodes-Kropf, M., Robinson, D., Viswanathan, S., 2004. Valuation waves and merger activity: The empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics.
6. Dong, M., Hirshleifer, D., Richardson, S., Teoh, S.H., 2003. Does investor misvaluation drive the takeover market? Unpublished working paper. Ohio State University.
7. Ang, J., Cheng, Y., 2003. Direct evidence on the market-driven acquisitions theory, Unpublished working paper. Florida State University.
8. Verter, G., 2002. Timing merger waves. Harvard University, Mimeo.
9. B. Jovanovic, P.L. Rousseau, Mergers and technological change: 1885-1998, Working Paper No. 01- W16, Department Of Economics Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37235, 2001.
10. J. Harford, What drives merger waves? Journal of Financial Economics 77 (2005) 529-560.
11. E. Devos, P-R. Kadapakkam, S. Krishnamurthy, How do Mergers Create Value? A Comparison of Taxes, Market Power, and Efficiency Improvements as Explanations for Synergies , Review of Financial Studies 22 (3), 2009 1179-1211.
12. Gort, M., 1969. An economic disturbance theory of mergers . Quarterly Journal of Economics 83, 623-642.
13. Coase, R., 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4, 386-405.
14. Jovanovic, B., Rousseau, P., 2001. Mergers and technological change: 1885-1998 . Unpublished working paper, Vanderbilt University.
15. Maksimovic, V., Phillips, G., 2001. The market for corporate assets: Who engages in mergers and asset sales and are there efficiency gains? Journal of Finance 56, 2019-2065.
16. Eisfeldt, A., Rampini, A., 2003. Capital reallocation and liquidity . Unpublished working paper. Northwestern University.
17. Harford, J., 1999. Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions . Journal of Finance 54, 1969-1997.
18. Schlingemann, F., Stulz, R., Walkling, R., 2002. Divestitures and the liquidity of the market for corporate assets. Journal of Financial Economics 64, 117-144.
