Institutionalization of the Sharing Economy: From the Information Society to Platform Competition
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article is devoted to the study and justification of the transformation of the essential orientation of institutions in the economy of the "non-platform" type and the sharing economy under the influence of the development of ecosystems and platforms. The relevance of this work is due to the importance of conducting institutional research in economics in terms of studying the stages of the genesis of the development of the information society, intensifying platform competition and ecosystem competition in the sharing economy. The aim of the work is to study and substantiate the set of institutional regulators of the impact on economic relations arising in the sharing economy in the context of the transformation of ideas for the development of the information society, the intensification of platform competition and ecosystem competition. In the course of the study, we used the method of content analysis of economic publications; scientometric approach to meaningful analysis of thematic foreign and domestic publications; the method of economic comparative studies, as well as methods of institutional analysis of economic and social processes that are the subject of study of the sharing economy. The genesis of the sharing economy, based on the widespread use of digital technologies, originates from the formation and development of the doctrines of the information society. The study of economic relations in the sharing economy is proposed to be carried out through the prism of the analysis of the transformation of ideas for the development of the information society, the intensification of platform competition and ecosystem competition. The author's position on the content of the institutionalization of the sharing economy is outlined based on the analysis of the stages of the genesis of the concepts of intellectualization of economic relations in the development of the sharing economy - the concepts of the noosphere, ecosystems, digital platforms. It is emphasized that the functions of institutions regulating the sharing economy are fundamentally changing. The purpose of such basic economic institutions as institutions of competition, property, market, economic power is considered. The importance and prospects of developing a system of formal and informal institutions that ensure the formation, functioning and transformation of ecosystems and platforms in the sharing economy are substantiated.

Keywords:
sharing economy, institutions, institutional research, information society, ecosystem, platform.
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Kleyner G.B. Ekonomika ekosistem: shag v buduschee // Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii. – 2019. – № 1 (59). – S. 40-45.

2. Ekosistemy razvitiya cifrovoy ekonomiki / N.A. Simchenko, A.I. Voloshin, E.V. Romanyuk i dr. – Simferopol': Krymskiy federal'nyy universitet imeni V.I. Vernadskogo, 2022. – 322 s.

3. Gelishanov, I. Z., Judina, T. N., & Babkin, A. V. (2018). Digital platforms in the economy: essence, models, development trends, St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal, Economics, 11(6), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.11602

4. Gupta, R., Mejia, C., & Kajikawa, Y. (2019). Business, innovation and digital ecosystems landscape survey and knowledge cross sharing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 100-109.

5. Kupriyanovsky, V., Namiot, D., & Sinyagov, S. (2016). Demystifying the Digital Economy. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 11, 59-63.

6. Lin, T. S. (2020). Conceptualizing a Sharing Economy Service through an Information Design Approach. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 965, 329-335.

7. Travkina, E. V., Zubenko, V. V., Terekhova, T. B., Vyacheslavovich, A., & Zubenko (2019). Sharing economy and transformation of network information technologies. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6), 5180-5185

8. Mi, Z., & Coffman, D. M. (2019). The sharing economy promotes sustainable societies. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09260-4

9. Nikitina, B., Korsun, M., Sarbaeva, I., & Zvonovsky, V. (2020). Development of the practice of sharing economy in the communicative information environment of modern urban communities. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 908, 376-394.

10. Panfilova, O., Okrepilov, V., & Kuzmina, S. (2018). Globalization impact on consumption and distribution in society, MATEC Web of Conferences, 01032. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.03.02.8

11. Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 1-10.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006

12. Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715-734. https://doi.org/10.1086/612649

13. Arcidiacono, D., Gandini, A., & Pais, I. (2018). Sharing what? The ‘sharing economy’ in the sociological debate. Sociological Review, 66(2), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.11.2.0039

14. Simchenko E.G. Transformaciya ekonomicheskih interesov v usloviyah perehoda k nacional'nomu ekonomicheskomu suverenitetu: politiko-ekonomicheskiy podhod // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Ekonomika i upravlenie. – 2022. – T. 8. – № 3. – S. 123-127.

15. Subetto A.I. XXI vek – «rody» noosfernoy istorii chelovechestva: nauchno-filosofskiy ocherk. – SPb: Asterion, 2022. – 44 s.

16. Bodrunov S.D. Noonomika i noosfera: vzaimosvyaz' i razlichiya koncepciy // Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. – 2022. – № 1. – S. 7-31.

17. Vernadskiy V. I. Neskol'ko slov o noosfere // Uspehi sovremennoy biologii. – 1944. – № 18. – Vyp. 2. –– S. 113–120.

18. Vernadskiy V. I. Nauchnaya mysl' kak planetnoe yavlenie [Elektronnyy resurs]. M.: Nauka, 1991. – Rezhim dostupa: http://vernadsky.lib.ru/e-texts/archive/thought.html (data obrascheniya: 17.01.2023 g.).

19. Bodrunov S.D. Noonomika kak strategicheskiy proekt // Strategirovanie: teoriya i praktika. – 2021. – T. 1. – № 2 (2). – S. 136-150.

20. Vernadskiy V.I. Mysli o sovremennom znachenii istorii znaniy. Doklad, prochitannyy na Pervom zasedanii Komissii po istorii znaniy 14.H.1926 g. / Trudy Komissii po istorii znaniy. T. I. L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1927.

21. Suess E. Die Entstehung der Alpen. Wien: Wilhelm Braumüller, 1875.

22. Teilhard de Chardin Pierre (1925). L’Hominisation. Introduction à une étude scientifique du Phénomène humain, in: Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Oeuvres, t. 3: La vision du passé. Paris: Du Seuil, 1957. Rp. 75–111.

23. Bodrunov S.D. Gryaduschee. Novoe industrial'noe obschestvo: perezagruzka. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyuciya, 2016.

24. Dana J.D. Manual of Geology: Treating of the Principles of the Science, with Special Reference to American Geological History. Philadelphia: Theodore Bliss & Co; London: Trübner&Co, 1863.

25. Menshutkin V.V., Levchenko V.F. Osnovannaya na veroyatnostnyh kletochnyh avtomatah model' evolyucii antroposfery // Biosfera. 2017. T. 9. № 4. – S. 275–285. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24855/BIOSFERA.V9I4.401.

26. Murray J. The depths of the ocean. London: Macmillan, 1912.

27. Le Roy E. L’exigence Idéaliste et le Fait de L’Évolution. Paris: Boivin & Cie, 1927.

28. Podolinsky S. ‘Le Socialisme et l’unité des forces physiques’// La Revue Socialiste. 1880. Vol. 8. P. 353–365.

29. Grushevickaya T.G. Ciolkovskiy K.E. i Vernadskiy V.I.: dve mechty o buduschem [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://readings.gmik.ru/lecture/2012-ke-tsiolkovskiy-i-vi-vernadskiy-dve-mechti-o-buduschem (data obrascheniya: 29.01.2023 g.).

30. Karpinskaya V.A. Ekosistema kak edinica ekonomicheskogo analiza // Sistemnye problemy otechestvennoy mezoekonomiki, mikroekonomiki, ekonomiki predpriyatiy: materialy Vtoroy konferencii Otdeleniya modelirovaniya proizvodstvennyh ob'ektov i kompleksov CEMI RAN, vyp. 2. – M.: CEMI RAN, 2018. – S. 125–141.

31. Adner R. Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy [Electronic resource] // Journal of Management – 2016. –Vol. 3 (1), pp. 39-58. – Available at: http://www.sagepub.com/journal.aspx?pid=10604 (date of access: 14.01.2023).

32. Jacobides M. G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems // Strategic Management Journal. – 2018. – Vol. 39. – Pp. 2255–2276. – doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904.

33. Tansley, A. G. The use and abuse of vegetational terms and concepts / A.G. Tansley // Ecology. – 1935. – No. 16 (3). – P. 284–307.

34. Rothschild, M. Bionomics: economy as ecosystem / M. Rothschild. – New York : Henry Holt and Company, 1990. – 423 r.

35. Moore, J. F. Predators and prey – A new ecology of competition / J. F. Moore // Harvard Business Review. – 1993. – Vol. 71. – No. 3. – P. 75–86.

36. Parker G., Van Alstyne M., Choudary S.P. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy – and How to Make Them Work for You, W. W. Norton & Company, 2016, p. 352.

37. Evans P., Gawer A. The rise of the platform enterprise: A global survey. The Emerging Platform Economy Series No. 1, The Center for Global Enterprise. – 2016.

38. Eisenmann T., Parker G., Van Alstyne M. Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal. – 2011. – vol. 32, pp. 1270–1285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.935

39. Smirnov E.N., Luk'yanov S.A. Imperativy upravleniya global'nymi cifrovymi platformami // Upravlenec. – 2020. – T. 11, №4. S. 59–69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-5.

40. Kapelyushnikov R.I. Ekonomicheskie ocherki: metodologiya, instituty, chelovecheskiy kapital. – M.: Nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy universitet "Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki", 2016. – 576 s.

41. Allen D. The Institutional Revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2011.

42. North, D. C. Institutions and Economic Growth: An Historical Introduction. World Development. – 1989. – Vol. 17(9). – Pp. 1319–1332.

43. Kapelyushnikov R.I. Contra paninstitucionalizm [Tekst] : preprint WP3/2019/03 / R. I. Kapelyushnikov ; Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». – M. : Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2019. – (Seriya WP3 «Problemy rynka truda»). – 84 s.

44. Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A. Institutions As a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth / P. Aghion, S.N. Durlauf (eds). Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam/London: Elsevier. – 2005. – Vol. 1A. Pp. 385–472.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?