from 01.01.2024 until now
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
VAC 5.2.5 Мировая экономика
BBK 6505 Управление экономикой. Экономическая статистика. Учет. Экономический анализ
Introduction. At present, the formation of a market economy continues in Russia, which explains the relevance of research aimed at studying the spillover effects of such a process. Purpose. To supplement existing knowledge in the field of political economy with the conclusion that one of the risks arising in the process of formation of a market economy is the risk of increasing spatial polarization of the development of types of economic activity that ensure the reproduction of human capital. Materials and Methods. To achieve the objectives of the study, regression analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis are mainly used. Results. The dominance of private property, characteristic of a market economy, gives additional impetus to the development of both education and activities in the field of health care and social services. However, the process of forming this type of economic system in Russia produces, as a result of the uneven flow of development on its territory, an increase in the spatial polarization of the development of these types of economic activity. This increases the inequality of opportunities for the implementation of citizens' rights to education and medical care in the regional context. Also, under the influence of the polarized development of education, life expectancy at birth is reduced, losses in real GDP per capita are formed, and the heterogeneity of the Russian economic space is growing. Conclusion. When forming a market economy in Russia, measures must be taken to minimize the risk of increasing spatial polarization of the development of types of economic activity that ensure the reproduction of human capital. A promising direction for future research is to study the impact of this process on the development of other types of economic activity.
reproduction of human capital, Ellison-Glaser index, LH-group, L. Anselin matrix, negative spatial autocorrelation, spatial polarization, share of private enterprises
1. Makkonnell K. R., Bryu S. L. Ekonomiks: principy, problemy i politika: per. s 14-go angl. izd. – M.: INFRA-M, 2003. 972 s.
2. Tatarkin A. I. Social'no-ekonomicheskie problemy formirovaniya rynochnyh otnosheniy regiona // Voprosy ekonomiki. 1993. № 6. S. 107–113.
3. Efimenkov V. I. Ekonomicheskaya reforma v regione // Voprosy ekonomiki. 1993. № 6. S. 121 – 123.
4. Kurushina E. V., Petrov M. B. Kriterii uspeshnosti proektov prostranstvennogo razvitiya na osnove mezhregional'noy integracii // Ekonomika regiona. 2018. T. 14. № 1. S. 176 – 189. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17059/2018-1-14. EDN YWWBRV.
5. Petti U. Ekonomicheskie i statisticheskie raboty. T. I – II. Perevod pod red. M. N. Smit. – M.: Socekgiz, 1940. 323 s.
6. Smit. A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov. – M.: Socekgiz, 1962. 684 s.
7. Marks K. Kapital. T. 1. – M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 2001. – 1702 s.
8. Buzgalin A. V, Kolganov A. I. «Rynochnocentricheskaya» ekonomicheskaya teoriya ustarela // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2004. № 3. S. 36 – 49. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2004-3-36-49. EDN PJJFQF.
9. Abramov A. E., Radygin A. D., Chernova M. I., Entov R. M. Gosudarstvennaya sobstvennost' i harakteristiki effektivnosti // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2017. № 4. S. 5 – 37. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-4-5-37. EDN YIXNBZ.
10. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. Chelovek, rynok i kapital v ekonomike XXI veka // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2006. № 3. S. 125 – 141. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2006-3-125-141. EDN JVIYBB.
11. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. Politicheskaya ekonomiya postsovetskogo marksizma (tezisy k formirovaniyu nauchnoy shkoly) // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2005. № 9. S. 36 – 55. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2005-9-36-55. EDN MUNBPD.
12. Wolhuter C. C., Niemczyk E. K. Reframing the concept of globalization and human capital in contemporary education // International Journal of Educational Research. 2023. Vol. 118. Article 102157. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102157.
13. Noumba I., Feunke Q. L. N. Parental Education, Household Health, and Household Standard of Living: Evidence from Rural Cameroon // International Business Research. 2020. Vol. 13, iss. 7. P. 113 – 129. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v13n7p113.
14. Gimpel'son V. E. Nuzhen li rossiyskoy ekonomike chelovecheskiy kapital? Desyat' somneniy // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2016. № 10. S. 129 – 143. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-10-129-143. EDN WQSXEV.
15. Lyubimov I. L. Tehnologii i chelovecheskiy kapital v sankcionnoy ekonomike // Ekonomicheskaya politika. 2022. T. 17. № 6. S. 40 – 67. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-6-40-67. EDN ZHQLYH.
16. Gimpel'son V. E. Chelovecheskiy kapital v epohu sankciy i kontrsankciy: nekotorye pereraspredelitel'nye posledstviya // Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy associacii. 2022. № 3 (55). S. 234 – 238. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-55-3-16. EDN KYTOVM.
17. Kobylko A. A., Rybachuk M. A. Chelovecheskiy kapital v strukture strategii kompanii: podhody k garmonizacii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika. 2024. T. 59. № 1. S. 29 – 52. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-1-2. EDN WEEVFH.
18. Tatarkin A. I., Shaymardanov N. Z., Kozlova O. A. Razvitie professional'nogo obrazovaniya kak faktor strukturnoy modernizacii ekonomiki Rossii // Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. 2010. № 3 (67). S. 7 – 12. EDN MUIQKX.
19. Tatarkin A. I., Krivenko N. V., Kuznecova N. L. Dialektika racional'nogo upravleniya izmeneniyami v regional'nyh social'nyh sistemah // Ekonomika regiona. 2015. № 2 (42). S. 125 – 136. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17059/2015-2-10. EDN: VHRTHN.
20. Aganbegyan A. G. O preodolenii stagnacii, recessii i dostizhenii pyatiprocentnogo rosta // Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii. 2019. № 2 (60). S. 17 – 23. EDN QBZBNC.
21. Aganbegyan A. G. Rossiya: ot otstalogo gosudarstvenno-oligarhicheskogo kapitalizma k peredovomu social'nomu gosudarstvu s razvitym rynkom i nauchno-tehnologicheskimi innovaciyami // Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii. 2023. № 3. S. 29 – 58. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8319974. EDN FVTPZU.
22. Lu W., Peng L., Fang N. The impact of human capital misallocation on green economy efficiency: Empirical analysis of Chinese urban agglomerations // Heliyon. 2024. Vol. 10, iss. 12. Article E32695. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32695.
23. Hu W., Huang W., Wu J., Zhang C. Place-based policies and local human capital accumulation: Evidence from China’s special economic zone program // China Economic Review. 2024. Vol. 85. Article 102163. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102163.
24. Zhao Z., Yue Y., Wang W. Unintended consequences of tax incentives on firms' human capital composition: Evidence from China // China Economic Review. 2024. Vol. 84. Article 102138. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102138.
25. Yudin I. B., Porosenkov G. A. Ocenka vliyaniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya predprinimateley na razvitie malogo i srednego biznesa v Rossii // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2022. № 7. S. 68 – 84. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-7-68-84. EDN BSVPDY.
26. Giommoni T. Exposure to corruption and political participation: Evidence from Italian municipalities // European Journal of Political Economy. 2021. Vol. 68. Article 102000. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102000.
27. Pittaluga G. B., Seghezza E., Morelli P. Media fabrication of corruption and the quality of the political class: The case of Italy // European Journal of Political Economy. 2023. Article 102461. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102461.
28. Li Y., Zhao X., Wang B. Public education expenditure and corporate human capital: Evidence from China // Finance Research Letters. 2024. Vol. 60. Article 104926. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104926.
29. Song J. Corporate ESG performance and human capital investment efficiency // Finance Research Letters. 2024. Vol. 62, Part B. Article 105239. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105239.
30. Yang J., Pei Y., Qiang W. The impact of automation on human capital investment // Finance Research Letters. 2024. Vol. 62, Part B. Article 105218. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105218.
31. Mareeva S. V., Slobodenyuk E. D. Neravenstvo investiciy v chelovecheskiy kapital rossiyskih detey // Terra Economicus. 2022. T. 20. № 3. S. 98 – 115. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-3-98-115. EDN QKFCNV.
32. Amoaning F., Obeng C. K., Cantah W. G. Impact of natural resource rents on well-being in sub-Saharan Africa: The role of human capital // Research in Globalization. 2024. Vol. 8. Article 100203. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100203.
33. Xu H., Ahmad M., Aziz A. L., Uddin I., Aljuaid M., Gu X. The linkages between energy efficiency, renewable electricity, human capital and inclusive growth: The role of technological development // Energy Strategy Reviews. 2024. Vol. 53. Article 101414. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101414.
34. Kapelyushnikov R. I. Otdacha ot obrazovaniya v Rossii: nizhe nekuda? // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2021. № 8. S. 37 – 68. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-8-37-68. EDN PHQPVC.
35. Avdeeva D. A. Vklad chelovecheskogo kapitala v rost rossiyskoy ekonomiki // Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2024. T. 28. № 1. S. 9 – 43. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2024-28-1-9-43. EDN DVKDJY.
36. Jardon C. M., Martinez-Cobas X., Shakina E. A. Human capital and border effect: The case of Minho River area // Papers in Regional Science. 2024. Vol. 103, iss. 4. Article 100035. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pirs.2024.100035.
37. Timushev E. N., Dubrovskaya Yu. V., Kozonogova E. V. Modelirovanie demograficheskoy situacii v regionah na osnove agentnogo podhoda // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2024. № 4. S. 127 – 147. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-4-127-147. EDN BOAIOP.
38. Osei D. B. Digital infrastructure and innovation in Africa: Does human capital mediates the effect? // Telematics and Informatics. 2024. Vol. 89. Article 102111. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102111.
39. Danta S., Rath B. N. Do institutional quality and human capital matter for innovation in case of Asian region? // Innovation and Green Development. 2024. Vol. 3, iss. 3. Article 100141. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2024.100141.
40. Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means // Research Policy. 2023. Vol. 52, iss. 6. Article 104765. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765.
41. Da Ponte A., Leon G., Alvarez I. Technological sovereignty of the EU in advanced 5G mobile communications: An empirical approach // Telecommunications Policy. 2023. Vol. 47, iss. 1. Article 102459. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102459.
42. Katul'skiy E. D., Ivanov A. A. Chelovecheskiy kapital v IT-industrii, ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' i tehnologicheskiy suverenitet // Social'no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2023. № 3 (52). S. 130 – 137. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2023-52-3-130-137. EDN PMQLRP.
43. Tatarkin A. I., Myzin A. L. Modelirovanie sostoyaniya nacional'nogo bogatstva regionov Rossii // Ekonomika regiona. 2013. № 4 (36). S. 53 – 65. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17059/2013-4-5. EDN RRSMIR.
44. Pavlov Yu. V., Koroleva E. N. Prostranstvennye vzaimodeystviya: ocenka na osnove global'nogo i lokal'nogo indeksov Morana // Prostranstvennaya ekonomika. 2014. № 3. S. 95 – 110. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.14530/se.2014.3.95-110. EDN SNZGYN.
45. P'yankova S. G., Kombarov M. A. Disproporcii v prostranstvennom razvitii Rossii i ee ekonomicheskih rayonov: vybor tochnogo i korrektnogo metoda ocenki i sposoby sglazhivaniya // Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. 2022. T. 15. № 3. S. 75 – 90. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.4. EDN AFRNGS.
