Methodological features of the research of the robotization in the industry through the prism of political-economic comprehension of neo-luddism

Tatsiana Serhiyevich

doi:10.52957/2221-3260-2024-3-12-24

VAK Russia 5.2.1

METHODOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE RESEARCH OF THE ROBOTIZATION IN THE INDUSTRY THROUGH THE PRISM OF POLITICAL-ECONOMIC COMPREHENSION OF NEO-LUDDISM Methodological features of the research of the robotization in the industry through the prism of political-economic comprehension of neo-luddism

АА Аа

Published in Theoretical economics · Issue 3 · Pages 12–24 · Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF THEORETICAL ECONOMY

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-3-12-24

Received: 06.03.2024 Accepted: 06.03.2024 Published: 14.04.2024

Authors

Tatsiana Serhiyevich

Academic degree: candidate of economic sciences

Science rang: docent

Belarusian National Technical University Minsk

ABSTRACT

The development of the robotization processes of the industry entails a kind of renaissance of research on the phenomena of Luddism and neo-Luddism. Neo-Luddism is considered in the context of an attempt to describe the reaction of a part of society to technological changes, including large-scale robotization of industry, transforming the social and labor landscape of the modern economic system, although it does not represent a complete concept and requires further scientific understanding. The purpose of this article is to identify, by turning to the political and economic features of the phenomena of Luddism and neo-Luddism, the methodological prerequisites for the study of industrial robotization, in particular the development of directions and tools for improving industrial modernization based on robotization. The use of the subject-activity approach (N.V. Gerasimov) and general scientific methods of cognition in the paper enable to describe the essence of Luddism and neo-Luddism through the prism of the clash of interests of individual social groups. A scientific discussion is presented regarding the impact of robotization of the industry on employment, and potential mechanisms for reducing the social costs of this process. The limits of applicability of these mechanisms and the political and economic grounds for their development and application are shown. It has been proven that the features of robotization of industry of specific economic systems, the effectiveness of directions and tools for improving this process, mechanisms for smoothing out socio-economic consequences and appropriating the positive effects of robotization depend on the existing balance of political and economic interests of social subjects and their groups. The obtained results can be useful in developing mechanisms for robotization of industry in the national economy and identifying potential economic and social risks arrising in this process. Further research of the impact of industrial robotization on employment in national economic systems may be of interest

KEYWORDS

modernization of the economy, robotization of industry, Luddism, neo-Luddism, social class groups, political and economic interests

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Akimov, A. A. Robototehnika i razvitie / A. A. Akimov // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2017. – Tom 61. – № 12. – S. 74–81. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-12-74-81 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZVRJNJ

2. Bodriyyar, Zh. K kritike politicheskoy ekonomii znaka / Zh. Bodriyyar ; per. s fr. D. Kralechkin. – M. : Akademicheskiy Prospekt, 2007. – 335 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QOHHJV

3. Buzgalin, A. V. Zheltye zhilety: novye luddity ili vyzov buduschego? (kratkie zametki o social'no-ekonomicheskih prichinah i trebovaniyah dvizheniya) / A. V. Buzgalin // Al'ternativy. – 2019. – № 1. – S. 43–47. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BGCQZX

4. Gerasimov, N. V. Ekonomicheskaya sistema: genezis, struktura, razvitie / N.V. Gerasimov ; redkol.: E. A. Lutohina [i dr.]. – Minsk : Navuka i tehnika, 1991. – 349 s.

5. Gorbatenko, D. N. Neoluddizm: navyazyvaemyy obraz zhizni ili neobhodimost' v sovremennyh realiyah / D. N. Gorbatenko, D. D. Sopoc'ko // Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G.V. Plehanova. Vstuplenie. Put' v nauku. –2020. –T. 10. –№ 4 (32). –S. 98–105. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NZGMWI

6. Gorbacheva, A. G. O social'no-ekonomicheskih posledstviyah vnedreniya konvergiruyuschih tehnologiy v zhizn' cheloveka / A. G. Gorbacheva // Chelovek.RU. –2016. –№ 11. –S. 96–105. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VVIOUF

7. Dulatova, N. V. Neoluddizm: istoriko-pravovoe razmyshlenie / N. V. Dulatova // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. –2022. –T. 22. –№ 1. – S. 56–60. https://doi.org/10.14529/law220109 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JEDQOK

8. Emelin, V. A. Ot neoluddizma k transgumanizmu: singulyarnost' i vertikal'nyy progress ili utrata indentichnosti? / V. A. Emelin // Filosofiya nauki i tehniki. – 2018. – T. 23. – № 1. – S. 103–115. https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2018-23-1-103-115 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XOSFYT

9. Kozhevina, O. Institucional'noe i normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie importozamescheniya v sfere informacionno-kommunikacionnyh tehnologiy / O. Kozhevina // Ekonomist. – 2020. – № 4. – S. 66–71. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VZEDGT

10. Lemeschenko, P. S. Institucional'nye aspekty etapa cifrovizacii politekonomicheskogo i social'nogo razvitiya / P. S. Lemeschenko // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. – 2019. – № 12. – S. 34–37. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MZLRUB

11. Lugovoy, O. Yu. Robotizaciya i perspektivy zanyatosti / O. Yu. Lugovoy // Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava. – 2020. – № 9. – S. 76–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.1305; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VYMPPW

12. Mart'yanov, V. S. Nashe rentnoe buduschee: global'nye kontury obschestva bez truda? / V. S. Mart'yanov // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. – 2017. – № 5. – S. 141–153. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YQRHIH

13. Podol'skiy, V. A. Analiz razlichiy mezhdu tradicionalizmom i konservatizmom na primere ludditskogo dvizheniya / V. A. Podol'skiy // Socium i vlast'. –2018. –№ 4 (72). C. 28–40. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PHXVKX

14. Sergievich, T. V. Klassifikaciya robotov v celyah ekonomicheskih issledovaniy / T. V. Sergievich // Ekonomicheskaya nauka segodnya : sb. nauch. st. / BNTU. – Minsk, 2022. – Vyp. 16. – S. 127–140. https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-6667-2022-16-127-140 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XHZAFD

15. Sergievich, T. V. Robotizaciya kak social'no-ekonomicheskiy fenomen / T. V. Sergievich // Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki NAN Belarusi : sb. nauch. st. / Nac. akad. nauk Belarusi, In-t ekonomiki. – 2022. – Vyp. 5. – S. 49–61. https://doi.org/10.47612/27895122202254961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47612/27895122202254961; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KHLRCA

16. Sergievich, T. V. Teoreticheskie podhody k traktovke social'no-ekonomicheskoy prirody robotov / T. V. Sergievich // Belorusskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. – 2022. – № 3. – S. 102–115. https://doi.org/10.46782/1818-4510-2022-3-102-115 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EJTHHF

17. Solodovnikov, S. Yu. Klassy i klassovaya bor'ba v postindustrial'nom obschestve: metodologicheskie osnovy politiko- ekonomicheskogo issledovaniya / S. Yu. Solodovnikov. – Minsk: BNTU, 2014. – 378 s.

18. Solodovnikov, S. Yu. Modernizaciya belorusskoy ekonomiki i ekonomika riskov: aktual'nye problemy i perspektivy / S. Yu. Solodovnikov, T. V. Sergievich, Yu. V. Meleshko ; pod nauch. red. S. Yu. Solodovnikova. – Minsk: BNTU, 2019. – 491 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JCYYHY

19. Solodovnikov, S. Yu. Ekonomika riskov / S. Yu. Solodovnikov // Ekonomicheskaya nauka segodnya : sb. nauch. st. / BNTU. – Minsk, 2018. – Vyp. 8. – S. 16–55. https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-6667-2018-8-16-55 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DXHMDX

20. Suvirov, N. I. Bezrabotica i strahovanie ot ee posledstviy v Zapadnoy Evrope / N. I. Suvirov. –SPb. : tip. t-va «Obschestv. pol'za», 1907. – 212 s.

21. Tischenko, P. D. Rossiya 2045: kotlovan dlya avatara (razmyshleniya v svyazi s knigoy «Global'noe buduschee 2045. Konvergentnye tehnologii (NBIKS) i transgumanisticheskaya evolyuciya») / P. D. Tischenko // Voprosy filosofii. – 2014. – № 8. – S. 181–186. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SJXJQJ

22. Toschenko, Zh. T. Novoe social'no-ekonomicheskoe yavlenie: prekariat / Zh. T. Toschenko // Noonomika i nooobschestvo. Al'manah trudov INIR im. S.Yu. Vitte. – 2022. –T. 1. – № 1. – S. 146–161. https://doi.org/10.37930/2782-618X-2022-1-1-146-161. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GBMQXQ

23. Chekmarev, O. P. Trudovaya teoriya stoimosti i robotizaciya ekonomiki / O. P. Chekmarev // Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. – 2017. – № 47. – S. 188–196. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZBEZWH

24. Yudina, T. N. Ot ekonomicheskogo k tehnologicheskomu, informacionno-cifrovomu determinizmu i «tehnologicheskoy predopredelennosti» / T. N. Yudina // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. –2021. – № 2. – S. 29–33. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CQUCWX

25. Acemoglu, D. Does the US tax Code Favor Automation? / D. Acemoglu, A. Manera, P. Restrepo // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. – Spring 2020. – Pp. 231–300. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2020.0003

26. Acemoglu, D. Robots and Lobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets / D. Acemoglu, P. Restrepo // Journal of Political Economy. – 2020. – Vol. 128. – № 6.

27. Akaev, A. A. Social and Economic Consequences of Large-scale Digitization and Robotization of the Modern Economy / A. Akaev, A. Rudskoy, T. Devezas // The Economics of Digital Transformation. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics / T. Devezas, J. Leitão, A. Sarygulov (Eds.). – Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021. – Ch. 2. – Pp. 5–24. – P. 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59959-1

28. Coulthard, D. Technophilia, neo-Luddism, eDependency and the judgement of Thamus / D. Coulthard, S. Keller // Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society. – 2012. – Vol. 10. – Iss 4. – Pp. 262–272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14779961211285881

29. Diederich, J. The Psychology of Artificial Superintelligence / J. Diederich. – Springer, 2021. – 147 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71842-8

30. Ford, M. R. The Lights in the Tunnel: Automation, Accelerating Technology and the Economy of the Future / M. R. Ford. – AcculantTM Publishing, 2009. – 253 p.

31. George, A.Luddite and proud: the spirit of the 19th-century textile worker lives on, if vainly / A. George // New Scientist. – 2011. –№ 212 (2844). – Pp. 40–41.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(11)63152-7

32. Klein, L. Luddism for the twenty-first century / L. Klein // International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. – 2001. – № 55(4). – Pp. 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0487

33. Kryszczuk, M. D. Neo-Luddism: Contemporary work and beyond / M. D. Kryszczuk, M. Wenzel // Przegląd Socjologiczny. – 2017. – Vol. LXVI. – Iss. 4. – Pp. 45–65. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2017/66.4/3

34. Randall, A. The “lessons” of Luddism / A. Randall // Endeavour. – 1998. – № 22 (4). – Pp. 152–155.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-9327(98)01145-4 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ADADRB

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

PDF JATS XML

Executive editor

Maksim Markin

markinmi@ystu.ru

Chief Editor

Valery Gordeev

vagordeev@rambler.ru

Deputy Editor-in-Chief

Marina Mayorova

mayorovama@ystu.ru

Deputy editor-in-chief

Galina Rodina

galinarodina@mail.ru

5655

downloads

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Creative Commons

GOST

Serhiyevich T. V. Methodological features of the research of the robotization in the industry through the prism of political-economic comprehension of neo-luddism // Theoretical economics. 2024. no. 3. pp. 12-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-3-12-24. (Date of access 28.10.2026).

MLA

Tatsiana Serhiyevich. "Methodological features of the research of the robotization in the industry through the prism of political-economic comprehension of neo-luddism." Theoretical economics.3 (2024): 12-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-3-12-24.

APA

Serhiyevich T. V. (2024). Methodological features of the research of the robotization in the industry through the prism of political-economic comprehension of neo-luddism. Theoretical economics(3), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-3-12-24

Chicago

Tatsiana Serhiyevich. "Methodological features of the research of the robotization in the industry through the prism of political-economic comprehension of neo-luddism." Theoretical economics, no. 3 (2024): 12-24. https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-3-12-24.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Serhiyevich T. V. | title = Methodological features of the research of the robotization in the industry through the prism of political-economic comprehension of neo-luddism | journal = Theoretical economics | year = 2024 | issue = 3 | pages = 12-24 | doi = 10.52957/2221-3260-2024-3-12-24 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

METHODOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE RESEARCH OF THE ROBOTIZATION IN THE INDUSTRY THROUGH THE PRISM OF POLITICAL-ECONOMIC COMPREHENSION OF NEO-LUDDISM Methodological features of the research of the robotization in the industry through the prism of political-economic comprehension of neo-luddism

Confirmation