Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation
Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation
Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation
Cameroon
Objective. To evaluate the prospects of anti-sanctions measures at the macro- and meso-levels in relation to the threats to the economy posed by sanctions of unfriendly states; to identify the fea-tures of the evaluation by different institutional groups of experts. Research Methods. Mono-graphic method - analysis of the theoretical positions expressed by domestic scientists with re-gard to the prospects of anti-sanctions measures at the macro- and meso-levels. The expert method was employed to determine the significance of anti-sanctions measures for stabilizing the economy of Russia and its regions. Due to the high degree of uncertainty in the assessed object state (projected anti-sanctions measures), the method of fuzzy sets was applied to process the information array. List of experts: representatives of business – 20 persons; representatives of education and research community – 24 persons; representatives of executive bodies of the Voronezh region state power – 24 persons. The assessment was carried out based on two pa-rameters of the proposed measures: the power of influence and the implementation probability. Comprehensive assessment, simultaneously taking into account the impact of both parameters, was conducted for all proposed measures for each institutional group on the basis of the tradi-tional tools of fuzzy logic. Results and discussion. The list of promising anti-sanctions measures formulated by the researchers is extremely wide. It is unlikely that they will be applied in their full scope. This required recourse to expert assessments. Experts formulated 30 promising anti-sanction measures. Experts considered five of the originally named thirty anti-sanction measures to be the most significant. The main results include the following provisions. Experts from business and executive authorities consider the most significant (taking into account the proba-bility of their implementation) support for existing production facilities, innovative development of technical and technological processes, increasing the availability of loans aimed at increasing production and competitiveness of enterprises. Enterprise subsidies are preferable as support methods. One promising measure belongs to the indirect group of measures – SME tax benefits. Federal measures to support enterprises are more important. The most optimistic group are ex-perts from executive authorities, their aggregate assessment of the most significant measures is the highest; the most pessimistic are experts from the research and educational community. The following were identified as significant threats: a general increase in the expenditures of compa-nies in the region; a decrease in the purchasing power of the region's population. The above four measures (subsidies) correlate clearly with these threats. At the same time, the first most im-portant measure – federal tax benefits for SME development and growth of working capital – does not directly correlate with any of the threats. In addition to the five most significant anti-sanction measures, experts from the executive authorities rated highly another 10 measures with the following characteristics: a wide range of goals and objects of support; differentiated set of support methods; equal distribution of measures' importance by subjects of support. The threats are sufficiently mitigated by the measures highly evaluated by the experts from the executive authorities.
threats to the regional economy, economic sanctions, anti-sanctions measures, expert method, fuzzy sets, Voronezh region
1. Abramovskih, L.N. Problemy formirovaniya mobilizacionnoy modeli v usloviyah cifrovoy ekonomiki Rossii / L.N. Abramovskih, A.V. Babenko. // Forsayt «Ros-siya»: buduschee tehnologiy, ekonomiki i cheloveka. - SPb: In-t im. S.Yu. Vitte, 2019. – S. 13-19.
2. Ashinova, M.K. Mery podderzhki ekonomiki Rossii i vozmozhnye makroekonomiche-skie posledstviya v usloviyah sankcionnogo davleniya / M.K. Ashinova, N.Sh. Kozlova, R.S. Kozlov // Novye tehnologii. – 2022. – T. 18. – № 3. – S. 127-133.
3. Baryshevskiy, S.O. Elementy teorii nechetkih mnozhestv i razvitie ponyatiya siste-my nechetkih mnozhestv / S.O. Baryshevskiy // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimen-tal'nogo obrazovaniya. – 2015. – № 10-1. – S. 39-40.
4. Voevodina, T.V. Mobilizacionnaya ekonomika kak uslovie innovaciy v Rossii / T.V. Voevodina // Filosofiya hozyaystva. – 2010. – № 3 (69). – S. 152–160.
5. Endovickiy, D.A. Distancionnoe obuchenie – disbalans vozmozhnostey i ugroz / D.A. Endovickiy, I.E. Risin, Yu.I. Treschevskiy, E.A. Rudnev // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. – 2022. – T. 1. № 1. – S. 89-97. – DOI:https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-1-89-97
6. Ivanov, O.B. Mobilizacionnaya ekonomika v Rossii: vchera, segodnya i … / O.B. Iva-nov, E.M. Buhval'd // ETAP: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika. – 2022. – № 3. – S. 7-27.
7. Kvasov, A.S. Sovremennoe polozhenie malogo i srednego biznesa v Rossii v uslovi-yah zapadnyh sankciy / A.S. Kvasov, D.N. Pavlov // Vestnik Universiteta Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya. – 2022. – № 4. – S. 140-147.
8. Kozlov, A.V. Metod opredeleniya urovnya razvitiya cifrovoy infrastruktury regio-na s primeneniem apparata nechetkih mnozhestv na primere Murmanskoy oblasti / A.V. Kozlov // Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka. – 2020. – № 1(67). – S. 106-117. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.37614/2220-802X.1.2020.67.009.
9. Kolmakova, I.D. Sostoyanie social'no-trudovoy sfery v kontekste strategii dosti-zheniya celey ustoychivogo razvitiya / I.D. Kolmakova, E.M. Kolmakova // Vestnik Che-lyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2022. – № 11 (469). – S. 81-91.
10. Konysheva, L.K. Osnovy teorii nechetkih mnozhestv: uchebnoe posobie / L.K. Konyshe-va, D.M. Nazarov. – SPb.: Piter, 2011. – 192 s.
11. Manushin, D.V. Mirovaya sankcionnaya ekonomika, sankcii, kontrsankcii i novaya mirovaya valyuta / D.V. Manushin // Russian Journal of Economics and Law. – 2022. – T. 16. – № 2. – S. 345-369.
12. Margoshvili, T.N. Pravovoe regulirovanie bankovskoy deyatel'nosti v usloviyah antirossiyskih sankciy v bankovskoy sfere / T.N. Margoshvili, M.V. Markina // Voprosy ustoychivogo razvitiya obschestva. – 2020. – № 7. – S. 394-398.
13. Medynskaya, M.K. Teoriya nechetkih mnozhestv. Ponyatie nechetkogo mnozhestva / M.K. Medynskaya // Mezhdunarodnaya konferenciya po myagkim vychisleniyam i izmereniyam. – 2015. – T. 1. – S. 46-48.
14. Postroenie kompleksnoy ocenki sostoyaniya mer podderzhki sub'ektov malogo i sred-nego predprinimatel'stva regionov Yuzhnogo federal'nogo okruga s ispol'zovaniem teorii nechetkih mnozhestv / N.G. Vovchenko, T.V. Bogachev, T.V. Alekseychik, Ya.I. Ku-rinova // Vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta (RINH). – 2021. – № 3(75). – S. 162-168.
15. Semyakin, M.N. Sovremennaya pravovaya politika Rossii v sfere obespecheniya prav sub'ektov predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti v usloviyah sankciy / M.N. Semyakin // Biznes, menedzhment i pravo. – 2022. – № 3 (55). – S. 15-21.
16. Sergeev, L.I. Osobennosti vosproizvodstva obschestvennogo produkta v usloviyah sankciy / L.I. Sergeev, D.L. Sergeev // Ekonomicheskiy vektor. – 2022. – № 4 (31). – S. 36-46.
17. Solieva, B.T. Bipolyarnye nechetkie mnozhestva i ih otlichie ot interval'nyh nechet-kih mnozhestv / B.T. Solieva, D.T. Muhamedieva // Global Science and Innovations: Central Asia. – 2021. – T. 3. – № 4 (12). – S. 149-154.
18. Tabachnikova, M.B. Ocenka ekonomicheskogo pessimizma institucional'nyh grupp regiona / Tabachnikova M.B. // Region: sistemy, ekonomika, upravlenie. – 2016. – № 1 (32). – S. 96-102.
19. Tabachnikova, M.B. Social'nye proekty s poziciy razlichnyh institucional'nyh grupp regiona / M.B. Tabachnikova // Sovremennaya ekonomika: problemy i resheniya. – 2015. – № 11 (71). – S. 89-107.
20. Treschevskiy, Yu.I. Analiz i prognozirovanie vliyaniya ekonomicheskih sankciy na rossiyskuyu ekonomiku v kratkosrochnom periode – ekonomiko-statisticheskiy i eks-pertnyy podhody / Yu.I. Treschevskiy, A.Yu. Kosobuckaya, Maketche Foka Klariss // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. – 2022. – № 10. – S. 132-147. – URL: http://www.theoreticaleconomy.ru; - DOI:https://doi.org/10.52957/22213260_2022_10_132.
21. Fayziev, R.A. Ispol'zovanie teorii nechetkih mnozhestv v ekonomicheskom analize investicionnyh proektov / R.A. Fayziev, U.T. Haitmatov, O.H. Azamatov, Sh.R. Dzhumaniyazov, H.H. Hasanova // International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy. – 2018. – T. 2. – № 5 (17). – S. 44-48.
22. Hahina, E.S. Sankcii kak ekonomicheskaya forma politizacii mezhgosudarstvennyh otnosheniy (k istorii voprosa) / E.S. Hahina, M.I. Berkovich // Upravlenie social'-no-ekonomicheskimi sistemami. – 2022. – № 1. – S. 4-10.
23. Shlychkov, V.V. Segodnya i zavtra rossiyskoy ekonomiki: vyzovy 2022 goda, novye realii i neopredelnnosti razvitiya / V.V. Shlychkov, P.A. Bataykin, D.R. Nestulaeva // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravle-nie. – 2022. – № 2 (58). – S. 101-112.
24. Nikitina L.M. Substantial characteristics of social projects: theoretical and empirical per-spectives / L.M. Nikitina, M.B. Tabachnikova // III International Symposium Engineering Management and Competitiveness (EMC 2013). – Zrenyanin (Serbiya), 2013. – P. 5-10.
25. Tabachnikova M.B. Analysis of economic optimism and pessimism of institutional groups in the region / Tabachnikova M.B., Treschevskiy Y.I., Plugatyreva A.A. // RJOAS: Rus-sian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. SSUE (66), Iune, 2017, pp. 175-184. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2017-06.20
