Moscow State University
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
Moscow, Russian Federation
Moscow, Russian Federation
The relevance of the presented study is determined by the fact that in the modern post-industrial era, the contribution of intellectual labor to the creation of added value is increasing, which is manifested in the rapid development of the knowledge economy, also known as the creative economy (industry). It is necessary to take into account that intellectual labor, generating new knowledge, as a resource is characterized by the absence of potential limitations, and as a product, on the one hand, has no logistical limitations, and, on the other hand, having an intangible form, it is quite difficult to measure, which entails problems in establishing a fair level of remuneration by the employer, and determining the taxable base and regulating production processes by public administration systems, as well as a number of other problems. The specified trend is an increase in the contribution of intellectual labor to the creation of added value, which naturally requires adequate consideration of the contribution of various components of labor to the economic result of the economic activity of companies. The purpose of the presented study is to develop models that take into account the assessment of the contribution of labor components to the economic result of business activities. The scientific novelty of the obtained results lies in the fact that in the work, based on the analysis of key areas of research carried out within the framework of labor economics as a science, the basic characteristics of knowledge as a production resource and commodity and the composition of the main factors of production in the development of the Cobb-Douglas production function model, a model is proposed that describes the dependence of the volume of production of products, taking into account the contribution of all factors of production, including: capital costs; production opportunities provided by the land used; invested entrepreneurial abilities; contribution of information; costs of physical labor; contribution of intellectual labor. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in expanding the possibilities of analyzing various factors of production on the economic results of business activities, as well as using the proposed theoretical model in constructing empirical dependencies of the production function, taking into account the contribution of all six main factors of production currently under consideration.
model formation, labor contribution assessment, economic result, business activity
1. Becker, Gary S. Human Capital. — N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1964. – 414 p.
2. Borjas, George J. Labor economics. — Seventh. — New York, NY, 2015. – 592 p.
3. Carlen, Joe. A brief history of entrepreneurship: the pioneers, profiteers, and racketeers who shaped our world. — New York. —243 p.
4. Cobb C.W., Douglas P.H. A Theory of Production // Amer. Econ. Rev. Suppl. 1928. Vol. 18. March. P. 139-165.
5. F. A. Hayek, Richard Cantillon, Henry Higgs. Essai Sur la Nature du Commerce en General. // The Economic Journal. — 1932-03. — T. 42, vyp. 165. — p. 61.
6. Graham, M., & Anwar, M. A. (2019). The global gig economy: Towards a planetary labour market? First Monday, 24(4). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/9913
7. Mincer J. The Production of Human Capital and The Lifccyclc of Earnings: Variations on a Theme. — Working Paper of the NBER, No 4838 (Aug. 1994).
8. Ben-Porath, Y. The Production of Human Capital and the Live. Cycle of Earning. / Y. Ben-Porath. - Journal of Political Economy», August, 1967, pp. 352-365
9. Mincer, Jacob, Human Capital Responses to Technological Change in the Labor Market (December 1989). NBER Working Paper No. w3207, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=226714.
10. Mulligan C.B. X.Sala-i-Martin. Measuring Aggregate Human Capital. — Working Paper of the NBER, No 5016 (Feb. 1995).
11. Schumpeter, Joseph A. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. — London: Routledge, 1992, 437 p.
12. Shultz T. Human Capital in the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. — N.Y., 1968, vol. 6.
13. Tarling R. (1987) Labour Markets. In: Palgrave Macmillan (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. – 949 p.
14. Wicksell K. Value, Capital and Rent, — Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2007. – 184 p.
15. Vasilenko V.A. Evolyuciya ekonomiki truda i puti ee razvitiya. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacional'nogo universiteta im. V.I. Vernadskogo Seriya «Ekonomika i upravlenie». Tom 22 (61). 2009. № 2. S. 97-105.
16. Genkin B. M. Ekonomika i sociologiya truda. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. — M.: Infra-M, 1998. S. 15. — 384 s.
17. Glaz'ev S. Yu. Teoriya dolgosrochnogo tehniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya / S. Yu. Glaz'ev; Mezhdunar. fond N. D. Kondrat'eva. - Moskva: VlaDar, 1993. - 310 s.
18. Dolzhenko R.A. O neobhodimosti vozrozhdeniya nauchnoy shkoly ekonomiki truda v regionah // Ekonomika truda. – 2020. – Tom 7. – № 11. – S. 1103-1116.
19. Elin A.M. Ekonomika truda i ergonomika: teoriya i praktika: Monografiya. VNII truda Mintruda Rossii. Tambov: Izdatel'stvo Yukonf, 2023. - 276 s.
20. Zolin I.E. Rynok truda v nacional'noy ekonomike (teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty). // Nacional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. 2014. №38, s.45-55.
21. Ivanova, A. R. Ekonomika truda / A. R. Ivanova, I. A. Vladimirov. — Tekst: neposredstvennyy // Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki: materialy I Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Chelyabinsk, dekabr' 2011 g.). — Chelyabinsk: Dva komsomol'ca, 2011. — S. 115-118.
22. Kapelyushnikov R. I. Skol'ko stoit chelovecheskiy kapital Rossii? — M.: VShE, 2012. — 76 s.
23. Makkonnell K. R., Bryu S. L. Ekonomiks: principy, problemy i politika. — M. : Respublika, 1992. — T. 2.
24. Myradov M.M. Faktory proizvodstva i ekonomika truda. // Vestnik nauki: №11 (56) tom 3. S. 27 - 31. 2022 g.
25. Ozernikova T.G. O razvitii predmeta ekonomiki truda. // Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii. 2011. № 5. S. 191-196.
26. Solov'eva T.N., Belyaev S.A., Shalimov I.V., Per'kova E.Yu. Rossiyskiy rynok truda: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. // Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava. – 2023. – № 5-1. – S. 141-147.
27. Tvorcheskiy funkcional: dolya kreativnoy ekonomiki k 2030 godu dolzhna dostich' 6%. https://iz.ru/1770651/lubov-lezneva/tvorceskii-funkcional-dola-kreativnoi-ekonomiki-k-2030-godu-dolzna-dostic-6 (data obrascheniya 30.09.2024)
28. Tebekin A.V. Izmenenie soderzhaniya truda, haraktera trudovyh otnosheniy, sistemy cennostey organizacii i motivov trudovoy deyatel'nosti pri perehode ekonomiki k novomu tehnologicheskomu ukladu. // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2022. № 1. S. 70-77.
29. Tebekin A.V. Prognoz ozhidaemyh izmeneniy v social'no-ekonomicheskih otnosheniyah v processe prodvizheniya obschestva k novym etapam razvitiya. // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta im. S.Yu. Vitte. Seriya 1: Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2021. № 3 (38). S. 7-12.
30. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. Buduschee obschestvennoy i chastnoy sobstvennosti v chasti intellektual'nogo produkta v svete proishodyaschih tehniko-tehnologicheskih i social'no-ekonomicheskih transformaciy. // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2021. № 5. S. 20-28.
31. Tebekin A.V., Tebekin P.A., Egorova A.A. Strategicheskoe vliyanie shestogo tehnologicheskogo uklada na nauchno-proizvodstvennye, ekonomicheskie, social'nye i politicheskie aspekty razvitiya mirovogo i nacional'nogo hozyaystva. // Epomen. 2020. № 49. S. 85-100.
32. Cygankov V.A. ekonomika truda: proshloe, nastoyaschee, buduschee. // Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. 2012. № 4 (21). S. 158-160.
33. Ekonomika znaniy: instituty i struktury [Tekst]: sbornik nauchnyh trudov / Rossiyskaya akad. nauk, In-t nauch. inform. po obschestvennym naukam (INION RAN); [otv. red. Pyastolov S. M.]. - Moskva: INION RAN, 2013. - 187 s.
34. Ekonomika truda: (social'no-trudovye otnosheniya) / Pod red. N.A. Volgina, Yu.G. Odegova. — M.: Ekzamen, 2002. — S. 9. — 736 s.
35. Ekonomika znaniy i intellektual'naya sobstvennost': innovacii i kommercializaciya [Elektronnyy resurs]: monografiya. – El. izd. - Elektron. tekstovye dan. (1 fayl pdf: 81 s.). - Nizhniy Novgorod: NOO «Professional'naya nauka», 2023. – Rezhim dostupa: http://scipro.ru/conf/monograph_101223.pdf.
36. Tinbergen Ya., Boss X. Matematicheskie modeli ekonomicheskogo rosta. — M.: Progress, 1967.
37. Gorbunov A.R. Faktor cenovogo klassa vypuska: novye puti issledovaniya i izmereniya tehnologicheskogo progressa. // BIZNES-INFORMATIKA, N4(06),2008, s.13-20.
38. Bykova, M.L. Issledovanie ustoychivogo raczvitiya regionov Rossiyskoy Federacii / M.L. Bykova // Innovacii i investicii. – 2024. - №3. – c. 201 – 204.
39. Abramov, T. E. Modelirovanie deyatel'nosti vysokotehnologichnogo innovacionnogo predpriyatiya pri pomoschi proizvodstvennoy funkcii tipa Kobba – Duglasa / T. E. Abramov, M. V. Baranov, V. V. Sokolyanskiy // Ekonomika vysokotehnologichnyh proizvodstv. – 2021. – T. 2, № 2. – S. 93-106.
40. Denison E. F. Issledovanie razlichiy v tempah ekonomicheskogo rosta. — M.: Progress, 1971.
